Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blyth RFC (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blyth RFC[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RU/N as a non-notable club (Club is a division 7 club). Also fails WP:GNG as only mentions I can find are just WP:TRIVIAL. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - as far as I can see, WP:NRU only seems to give guidance on rugby players rather than clubs. Is there a notability guideline for rugby clubs or is it just GNG? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, tagged the wrong guideline. The specific club related guideline is WP:RU/N. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above linked guideline as well as WP:GNG and WP:NORG; coverage is trivial and does not satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom, fails WP:RU/N and WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Durham/Northumberland 3, not enough notability to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not 100% sure they're in that division. Durham/Northumberland 2 is showing them in that division but it's listed as 19/20 and I haven't been able to find any information from the club stating what division they're in. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to suggest they're in 3 (whether it's true with COVID I'm not sure as the fixtures won't have happened) so redirect to as you suggested, but is it a suitable redirect given they're been promoted and relegated recently. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Below the level of sport we should be covering. Local interest only. Nigej (talk) 17:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom.Sonofstar (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.