Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluedildonics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Teledildonics. --PeaceNT (talk) 06:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bluedildonics[edit]

Merge to sex toys. Imagine, a vibrator that can be controlled over the telephone. Ain't the 21st century great? Mandsford (talk) 20:45, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Teledildonics. Sufficient coverage already exists there (a sentence mentioning that the neologism or subtopic exists), though it is unreferenced. Someone in a less public area than where I currently sit should vet and add references from here as appropriate. - Eldereft (cont.) 22:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not sure I agree with a merge but Teledildonics doesn't seem to be the best target as that's about computer use whereas this is a similar but different technology. Banjeboi 00:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - Bluedildonics are not the same as Teledildonics. For a start, they are controlled by bluetooth: you send a text message (SMS) to your lover, who is wearing the bluedildonic inside her vagina all day. Her mobile phone sends a message via Bluetooth to her bluedildonic. Each letter of the alphabet creates a different sensation/vibration. Only text messages received from your phone will activate the bluedildonic (although you can set it so that any text message will activate it). These are gaining popularity in the UK where they are mainly sold, and the product features regularly on TV. So of course it should neither be merged nor anything like that.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tris2000 (talk • contribs)

But if you do try to merge it, please read the instruction manual first. Bluedildonics is not responsible for any discomfort that comes from wearing the product inside your vagina all day. Mandsford (talk) 00:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Teledildonics and name page Dildonics which is what it was once called anyway. There is currently simply not enough material to justify 2 pages. --Simon Speed (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge - not notable on its own --T-rex 19:55, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Teledildonics, not notable enough on its own yet, and not sufficiently differentYobmod (talk) 10:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Yobmod. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.