Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue sustainability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Already deleted as copyvio. Would have failed anyway as unencyclopedic waffle about a neologism. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blue sustainability[edit]

Duplicate article of Blue (Sustainability), which is also unwikified and unencyclopedic. Qsung (talk) 04:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I was just looking at the other copy of this article (which I have now redirected to this one) as a possible copyvio. This seems to be a concatenation of [1], [2], and [3]. Now, two of those (the first and third) are under Creative Commons licenses, specifying that they must be attributed and linked as the source if the material is reused. The other doesn't seem to have any copyright information, which I believe means that its author has implicit copyright. So this article would seem to be a copyvio of three different sources. I'm not an expert on copyright policy, but if I'm right in my analysis, then the whole thing should be speedied per WP:CSD#G12. Could someone point me to relevant policies? AnturiaethwrTalk 04:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.