Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Ribbon Soundworks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. nomination withdrawn DGG ( talk ) 17:54, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Ribbon Soundworks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not be notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. No references provided. Google search did not provide anything substantial. Please add references if notable. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep & comment I can work on getting some more references. This company's products were prominent in the computer music production world in the early '90s and there are going to be lots of references in paper magazines from the era (for example, here is one from Sound on Sound). As this company largely existed before the popularity of the web and many magazines from that era are now extinct, there are not going to be a lot of solid google-able references. In addition, the company was originally named "Blue Ribbon Bakery" which is a rather ambiguous term so that's also going to interfere with simple searches. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 19:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep appears to be a notable part of Microsoft history with cites available. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:46, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sources added I've added five sources so far, including three different print magazines of the era. This should establish notability per WP:COMPANY. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing Nomination This article has been revamped albeit a little but has considerable chances to do better.Thanks for Your efforts @Orange Suede Sofa.Lakun.patra (talk) 06:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.