Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Ribbon (anti-tobacco, anti-second hand smoke)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was MERGE to Blue ribbon. I'll do my best, but I'm going to be fairly brutal. -Splash^talk 22:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Ribbon (anti-tobacco, anti-second hand smoke), Anti-tobacco, anti-second hand smoke[edit]

non-notable Grocer 13:50, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Anti-tobacco, anti-second hand smoke per Xaosflux, below. -- Krash (Talk) 17:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong? What is problem? What change should be done to continue putting this article in Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueRibbon (talk • contribs)

Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and articles must have a neutral point of view (the links go to the relevant policies). The current article is just advocacy, however much I might happen to agree with it (eg. there is still debate as to the significance of second hand smoke as a health hazard; certainly prolonged domestic/workplace exposure appears to somewhat correlated to health damage, but there is little evidence on the dose-response relationship). Anyway, the links in the page go to more advocacy, rather than reliable sources. I can't really see a way to re-write the article to get the required balance, hence my opinion. Sliggy 15:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also delete Anti-tobacco, anti-second hand smoke now it has been added to this discussion. Passive smoking covers the medical issues, smoking ban the campaigning side of things. Sliggy 20:51, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Blue ribbon as this a worthwhile addition to the list of uses of blue in ribbon symbolism. MLA 16:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge as above. Leave us smokers alone! Keresaspa 18:42, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per MLA. Ardenn 03:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, along with Anti-tobacco, anti-second hand smoke -- xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:45, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no real additional info for the prospective merge. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 03:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article indicates that blue ribbon anti second hand smoke campaign exsists in Canada, never says "let's join the campaign."

Existence of the campaign is obvious fact. Is telling about this campaign wrong in Wikipedia? "Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign" has independent article. What difference lies between these two campaign? BlueRibbon

Delete. Advocacy soapbox. -- Krash (Talk) 17:02, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.