Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Kangaroo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Kangaroo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Most sources appear to find random tech blogs of the sort already linked (which do not appear to meet WP:RS), and most information about "Blue Kangaroo" online refers to a series of books, other companies (such as a coffee shop and a graphic design agency), or information about actual blue kangaroos in art. No evidence of meeting WP:CORP. Kinu ^t/_c 00:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No coverage found that would indicate notability. --Michig (talk) 05:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CORP. Also note Alexa rank of 509,984, which strongly suggests this hasn't taken off in any significant way yet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:35, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm unable to find sufficient coverage for this subject to satisfy WP:GNG, WP:WEB, or WP:CORP. Gong show 06:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.