Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blu-spec CD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blu-spec CD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability. Article reads like an advertisement for a CD pressing plant and makes claims of audio woo hiding them under weasel words such as “purpotedly”, “Sony claims”. Nowak Kowalski (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:55, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - This should be a footnote on the CD page, as in failed attempts to improve on the CD. I know that the sources are primarily in Japanese and primary in nature, but I don't really see anything practical as relates to audio quality (not that I'd know). What's kind of odd is that when selling regular CDs, Sony would likely say that there isn't an issue that requires fixing with the optical read-out process. That said, it did apparently exist and Sony did apparently manufacture some discs although who knows if they actually sold any. I see the cover of Blow by Blow in there. Maybe a paragraph should be added to the Compact Disc Digital Audio page under 'Format Variations'. Kind of fun but it's not notable enough for its own page though. ogenstein (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.