Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodfist 2050
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Bloodfist 2050[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bloodfist 2050 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to be notable. I found a review at "vocal.media", but I am unfamiliar if this source is reliable or not. Otherwise, I'm finding blogs, user-generated databases, and listings in online library catalogs. Appears to be a one-off from the end of a film series based on Bloodfist, but I'm really doubting the notability of this one. Hog Farm Bacon 04:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 04:04, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There are several reviews linked off IMDb. Also, the final part of the world's longest martial arts film series makes it notable to me. Udar55 (talk) 05:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- The reviews on IMDb are all either user-generated, or are external reviews on bloggish-looking sites. This film can't inherit notability from the series, see WP:NOTINHERITED. Hog Farm Bacon 15:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There are several reviews linked off IMDb. Also, the final part of the world's longest martial arts film series makes it notable to me. Udar55 (talk) 05:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 06:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 06:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks the coverage needed to pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Since only a few reviews are out there about it and they are in sketchy sources. The fact that's connected to an otherwise notable film series doesn't really matter either. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.