Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlockCommunity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BlockCommunity[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline A7, with the claim of significance the number of forum posts. This web game does not appear to meet the notability guidelines at WP:WEB, WP:PRODUCT, or WP:GNG. Based on the history of recreation, bringing this to AfD and requesting some salt if the outcome is delete. VQuakr (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Salavat (talk) 08:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As far as I can tell, information about the site cannot be verified through reliable, secondary sources. Therefore we should not have an article on it regardless of how many posts and users it has. Marasmusine (talk) 09:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have found not one reliable source about this gaming community. Goodvac (talk) 09:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sources exist to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.