Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blinkenlights Archaeological Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blinkenlights Archaeological Institute[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage I could find and their website doesn't appear to have been updated in many, many years, so no help there either. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 00:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 00:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 00:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I see three references at https://www.google.com/search?tbm=nws&q=%22Blinkenlights+Archaeological+Institute%22+-wikipedia&tbs=ar:1 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, not sure why my search didn't turn up those. Looks like the two foreign-language sources are are reporting on the same list of "potential first PCs" and the other source is an interview that describes the "Archeological Institute" as a blog. Still not great IMO. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 03:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the only English language source is nj.com, however, that still isn't a significant coverage either. WikiLinuz 🍁 (talk) 19:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only English language source isn't about the Institute itself, it just refers to the blog in passing. PianoDan (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources are cited. Multi7001 (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete good catch. It appears to be one hobbyist's web site? Unlikely it will ever be notable. W Nowicki (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ThadeusOfNazereth. Couldn't find anything significant in GScholars as well. WikiLinuz 🍁 (talk) 19:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can’t find anything that suggests notability Devokewater ^(talk) 22:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.