Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blink-182's sixth studio album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blink-182#Reformation (2009–present). (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blink-182's sixth studio album[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. PROD rationale was "WP:HAMMER. No title, track listing, or release date for this album have been announced. The verifiable information on its recording is already present at Blink-182#Reformation (2009–present)." I still stand by that. This whole thing was ripped straight from the artist article, and it's too soon for an article on an album that has no title, track listing, or release date. IllaZilla (talk) 19:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Blink-182#Reformation (2009–present). There are enough references, so this doesn't seem like a matter for AfD. Melchoir (talk) 04:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The entire content was copied from that very section. It could be restored simply by going back to the history. That's my point, that this was a premature split of a topic that's not ready for a separate article, and that was simply ripped from the main article where it was already well-covered. Redirecting would just be creating a loop: the thing to do IMO is to delete the new article & restore the content to the main article by simply recovering it from the history. --IllaZilla (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have left notices on the talk pages of the 4 editors (other than myself) who commented on the proposed deletion at the article's talk page, informing them that the article is now at AfD and that they are invited to participate in this discussion. --IllaZilla (talk) 06:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Nothing new here. No need for a separate article, this material rightly belongs in the main Blink 182 article. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. No confirmation of album's name, track listing, producers, etc. Strikerforce (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.