Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bletchley Landfill Site

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 23:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bletchley Landfill Site[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of a landfill is questionable, and only provided source is the site owner. McDoob AU93 18:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Newton Leys the new settlement being built next to it. My guess is that Newton Leys will expand over the site when it is full. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looks like an ordinary brownfield. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete no third party significant coverage. Its former role as brickworks is covered in its own article. LibStar (talk) 13:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A non article. Szzuk (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.