Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blazing Inferno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A7 is pretty relevant here. Tone 13:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blazing Inferno[edit]

Contested prod. Non-notable, unsigned band; no independent references; claims chart-topping performance on "BlueBox Hot 100", which doesn't get any Google hits either. Hqb (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per A7 Article does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. The subject has not been subject to broadcast by a media network, nor has it been recognised in music charts or won any awards, so it fails our notability criteria for music:

Google web search brings up a myspace page, a bebo page (both social networking sites) and a blog. That's it.

Need I say more?--Patton^t/c 20:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. I don't think it will get speedied, as much as we'd want too, because of the alleged "#1 on the BlueBox Hot 100". Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 20:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there's not sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 21:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.