Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blauk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 11:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blauk[edit]

Blauk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about an unnotable social network. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete nn Staszek Lem (talk) 18:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There's some coverage in Indian media[1][2] and in an ebook that looks self-published[3]. I don't think that's enough to be notable (List of social networking websites is very long and limited only to notable sites so I don't think there's a sensible merge/redirect target). Colapeninsula (talk) 15:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Several searches gave that The Hindu link too and my last search found a blacklisted examiner.com link, not much for notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.