Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlankTV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BlankTV[edit]

nn website, spam, alexa rating of 465,299 Giant onehead 00:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Switch off per nom. MER-C 08:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are sufficient Ghits to make this notable. The site provides music (etc) of a genre I hate at a price I like (free), and appears to me to meet WP:Notability. I'm not overkeen on short, bullet pointed nominations like this one's nomination with no rationale given, pehaps an elaboration would be in order? Fiddle Faddle 11:02, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Sufficient GHits" are not a criteria of WP:WEB. They're also not enough by themselves in WP:N, especially when there's no evidence that it even meets WP:V. All the talk I find on it is on blogs, which don't meet the reliable sources criteria. While the nominator could have expanded upon these points more thoroughly, this doesn't mean it's an automatic keep. ColourBurst 15:44, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE Does not meet WP:V and does not follow WP:WEB. --Brian ^{(How am I doing?)} 18:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and Bschott/Purple Brian Bwithh 22:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.