Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blane Vick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:NPOL, inadequately sourced per discussion. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 21:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blane Vick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable politician. PepperBeast (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Georgia (U.S. state). PepperBeast (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Local politician fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 23:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability, per WP: GNG. Article could use some grammar/sentence structure improvements if elected to stay in mainspace. NiklausGerard (talk) 02:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even if he had won the county level race he would not be for sure notable, loosing in it basically makes him by definition non-notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL and there isn't anything in terms of referencing to indicate a GNG pass. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.