Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black fold on optomitrist glasses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. BTW, what this user was describing was simply a pair of sunglasses that clip on to a pair of prescribed glasses. Denelson 83 02:44, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Black fold on optomitrist glasses[edit]

Almost an empty/nonsense article. Certainly not encyclopedic. —Cleared as filed. 05:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Ifnord 05:27, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete lack of context; probably has a name, but is a dicdef (sort of) anyway... maybe is a request for an article on a part of glasses...? jnothman ^talk 07:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not encyclopaedic, would be better of deleting and starting from scratch if we ever get an article on this phenomenon. It's not patent nonsense, Ifnord. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonsense Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 13:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What I perceive here is a badly executed article request by someone who wants to know what these things are, and couldn't find them in Wikipedia because he didn't know what they were called. Unfortunately, his description isn't very clear and I can't figure out what he's referring to. It is not a trial frame or phoropter. Most likely, he is describing a kind of very cheap, disposable sunglasses that are nothing more than stamped plastic sheet of clear, dark grey plastic. They have no frames, hinges, or temples so they cost very little. They are placed underneath a regular pair of glasses and rely on the regular glasses to hold them in place. Eye doctors sometimes offer them to patients to wear on leaving the office after their eyes have been dilated. The only thing is, these don't fold. Hey, Edwardian, any thoughts? Dpbsmith (talk) 00:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with Dpbsmith. There are some that fold and some that do not. I've added a comment to Sunglasses about "various disposable sunglasses" to clarify what the original author to this article had in mind. Edwardian 00:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominated Ze miguel 13:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.