Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Forest Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close - please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Forest Group (2nd nomination) instead. Thanks. (Non-admin close). Stalwart111 10:27, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Black Forest Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Group no longer seems to be active. The references date from the 1990s. Its notability, even from that time, is questionable. The group just seems to have been a loose affiliation of people working in similar industries, and not any sort of formal group. U2fanboi (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Why is this not properly transcluded? Bearian (talk) 19:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Dunno, I listed it on March 10, I thought I had gone through the process correctly. U2fanboi (talk) 08:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll attempt to add it again.U2fanboi (talk) 08:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can somebody help on this - I added it to today's list but the item title is not showing up.U2fanboi (talk) 09:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.