Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizon Computers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In general it seems there's consensus to suggest the subject-matter is not notable enough. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bizon Computers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no notability for this company. None whatsoever. Just because a company puts Mac OS X on regular computers does not make it notable. Cman (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All the given sources seem to be about a different company. I was unable to find any significant coverage of Bizon Computers. Haakon (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete average company doing average things. a below-the radar system builder pre-loads OSX, yawn. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
Merge as a short section in Macintosh clone. As far as I can tell, the sources are about "Russian Mac", which is the name Bizon uses for its range of computers. This is interesting because there are very few companies (three?) preinstalling OSX. That is the only reason why this company is notable. ComputScientist (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not only is the company not notable but based on the outcome of the Apple vs Psystar case (Apple's protection methods are protected under the DMCA) it is questionable if their Mac-Clone product is legal in the US or EU.--BruceGrubb (talk) 20:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom DRosin (talk) 22:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or merge, it has some reputable coverage, like from SoftPedia --SF007 (talk) 11:17, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.