Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitrix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 00:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bitrix[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non-notable company; article from SPA with conflict of interest [1] (he's a marketing person working for the company). Sources given are insignificant trade rags. Haakon (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, unambiguous advertising Nothing more than a Advertisement masquerading as an article created by an WP:SPA using Wikipedia as a vehicle for advertising and promotion --Hu12 (talk) 06:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 04:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete as per Hu12. I'd love to see an article about these guys one there are WP:RS. Joe407 (talk) 05:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I do not understand why speedy deletion was declined: . BIP is a business-driven intranet solution designed for Enterprise 2.0 collaboration that includes the latest integrated communication, collaboration, social networking, document sharing, project and business process management, extranet support and task management tools. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.