Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitextor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bitextor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Jujutacular ^T · C 16:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an application whose objective is to generate translation memories using multilingual websites as a corpus source. Which actually sounds like an interesting application; the idea apparently being to discover multi-lingual versions of the same text to improve machine translation. But the user base for such a tool is going to make notability rather hard to achieve. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A search returns plenty of options for download, but nothing resembling significant coverage or anything indicative of notability. Transmissionelement (talk) 17:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This seems to be academic software. A few gshcolar hits. Not much else; nothing in the news or books. Pcap ping 07:20, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not appear to qualify for inclusion under the notability guidelines per a lack of significant coverage in reliable 3rd party sources. Cocytus [»talk«] 03:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.