Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitShares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BitShares[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a non-notable cryptocurrency. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by SPA who has no edits outside this topic. MER-C 10:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral~~Delete~~ Standard run fo the mill reporting by non RS crypto sites. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 11:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

very nice TNT by Jtbobways, however I wish that this cc had a few more major non-cryptojournal news sources talking about it, so withdrawing my delete vote. ^{cinco de}L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 19:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with "Standard run fo the mill reporting by non RS crypto sites." ... --Lauranos (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources, no indication of notability. "Standard run fo the mill reporting by non RS crypto sites." Yes, but the article has a whole lot of them as well as all the fanciest buzzwords. Of course, a lot of nonsense is still nonsense. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep @Smallbones:, @Lauranos:, @L3X1: I added a few sources and blanked the majority of the article. It is currently a stub. Seemed to be some WSJ and maybe NYT sources but I don't have a paid account so I couldn't read those hits. Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 12:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - Looks really better Jtbobwaysf ... --Lauranos (talk) 08:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't check the FT references, but the others are trivial. Possibly redirect to Daniel Larimer. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the ft.com sources no paid account is needed. But free registration is required. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 06:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.