Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birthday game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, clear case of made-up. No need to re-list or keep this going.TravellingCari 14:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday game[edit]

IP address (probably author) removed PROD without explanation Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- unverifiable nonsense about a game played in some office. No reliable sources, this not what Wikipedia is for. J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - and the winner of this weeks WP:MADEUP award goes to... Birthday game! -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 12:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- Looks like our friend is removing the AFD templates. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've issued a last warning. If they do it again, I will block. J Milburn (talk) 12:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - IP blocked, warning issued to page creator. I suspect the four people in the world who play this game are now working together, probably all from the same office... J Milburn (talk) 12:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Author blocked. J Milburn (talk) 12:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Maybe he's driving to an internet cafe to do it all over again :D Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:20, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Maybe we should call his boss and tell him what he's really doing... J Milburn (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Comment Is it worth asking for a Checkuser on 62.173.74.234 and Scanners81? -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 12:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Not really, they've both been temporarily blocked anyway. J Milburn (talk) 12:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Fair enough. I've placed the {{SharedIP}} template on the IP user's talk page anyway. Big Brother is indeed watching him/her! ;-) -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 12:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speedily if you can, please. It's really embarrassing to Wikipedia that crap like this isn't deleted immediately. Peacock (talk) 23:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Blow out the candle Non-notable game. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vandalism. Ningauble (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What's to be further discussed? Even before the relisting, it looked pretty snowy in here. Umbralcorax (talk) 12:49, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP. Why is an AfD that's only two days old being relisted? Deor (talk) 12:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment So there would be a more thorough consensus. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD's are not usually relisted unless they have been active for the standard five days without a consensus having become evident. This isn't a message board where one can "bump" threads. Deor (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:MADEUP. If possible follow WP:SNOW guidelines. StaticGull Talk 14:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe that this is being relisted for further discussion. Do you think there's something special about three guys in an office playing a game? Mandsford (talk) 14:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.