Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham to London in 5 minutes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birmingham to London in 5 minutes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In my opinion this subject of this article does not meet wikipedia's General notability guidelines. Did brief search, not able to find significant secondary sources covering the subject. Sassmouth (talk) 08:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if this is to be deleted, can a copy be sent to my draft space please? There is a number of films that could be included, all created by British Rail. Nordic Nightfury 13:07, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't believe WP has every considered corporate promotional films/videos notable in themselves, and only if they otherwise satisfy the WP:NOTFILM or WP:GNG, neither of which are evident here. It may, however, be possible to satisfy those criteria for an article that aggregates BritRail films as a whole oeuvre (as it were). Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:51, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:24, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Eggishorn. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 09:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to fail the WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 02:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.