Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bircas hatorah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bircas hatorah[edit]

This article contains promotional information taken from Yeshivat Bircas Hatorah's website. The yeshiva itself appears to be small and non-notable Eliyak T·C 04:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per {{db-group}}. No claim to notability, I've tagged the article as speedy as well. -- Chabuk 04:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete I cannot find any copyvio as Eliyak implies there is. This is definally not a speedy. some yeshivot are notable and some are not; this has to be sorted out in AFD. Speedy if for clear cases where there is (almost) no arguement about. This yeshiva does not apear to be notable. Jon513 11:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I would have speedied it, except that it wasn't 100% clear to me that the yeshiva is non-notable. (perhaps if they didn't have such a snazzy website...) However, the material was copied from http://www.bircas.com/aboutus/bircascommunity.html (second section). --Eliyak T·C 14:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Recent edits have removed the copyright issue. JoshuaZ 04:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete --Shaul avrom 20:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no inherent notability for schools. This one is quite trivial, it appears. - CrazyRussian talk/email 03:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As a non-notable Yeshiva even if it weren't possibly copyvio. Presumably an article could be made here on birchas/birchat hatorah - that is those blessings in Jewish law but that would be a completely different topic (and possibly too specialized for Wiki anyways). JoshuaZ 19:26, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't assert notability. JASpencer 07:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.