Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biomics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biomics[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

concept does not appear to exist outside of a wikipedia editors mind. Has never had a single reference in 13 years. Brief look at internet has the word 'biomics' used as a slogan/part of a name in various biomedical university groups (2x Netherlands, France, Russia), biotech companies (Germany, Netherlands), pharmaceutical businesses (China, Mexico, UK, ), an educational library site with webinars, three businesses doing microbial assays -one for aquaria (in Belgium/Germany, France, US), various herbal supplement companies, a Chinese fish oil company, an American agricultural start-up developing 'organic' pesticide chemicals, a sketchy company selling ...uh... a holistic life revolution with an entirely new class of drugs which will heal anything... there is a company way at the end of the my third search page which appears to use the term in a wikipedia way -except they call it envirobiomics and invent a whole bunch of new words with -omics in there -but this company was founded after the wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leo Breman (talk • contribs) 15:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 15:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The few hits on GBooks and Google Scholar do not use this term to refer to what this article is about. Not a notable concept. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One of those words that's easy enough to coin that it gets tossed around now and then, but not a topic we need an article for. XOR'easter (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The study of biomes using bioinformatics is certainly a thing, but the word 'biomics' in relation to that seems to be a neologism. — Charles Stewart (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.