Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Binfire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability: I cannot locate significant RS coverage to meet WP:CORPDEPTH; all coverage is trivial or PR-like. Article is written in a promotional tone, so WP:PROMO applies. Article has been created and edited by single purpose accounts such as:

So COI is possibly a factor. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:08, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I myself am frankly nearly speedying, it's that blatant. SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possibly by putting in a bin and setting on fire. Reference check shows a few actual proper reviews in RSes, but mostly press releases. Also, if a source lists "White papers" in its top bar, it's an analyst site whose opinions are for hire and the link should be regarded as sponsored content - David Gerard (talk) 10:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- (I can hardly believe that they literally called their product a dumpster fire) - David Gerard (talk) 18:50, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've been finding mentions of "bin fires" when I was looking for sources :-) K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.