Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bindaas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Bindaas

Bindaas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Reads like an ad with no encyclopaedic content. Only edits to the article are additions to a trivia section of "Programs aired". Requests for references are ignored while templates requesting clean-up and references get constantly removed. / Mats Halldin (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

To be a little more specific:

• The article was created by Thewarriorrrr and the only other contributors except myself are anons with IPs 122.162.X.
• I've spent a month trying to convince this contributor to add a single reference to the article with no success. I even added the single dummy reference there is to show how to use references. The latest response on the talk page was "Those doubting the reliability of the content of this article should search the web and see for themselves how accurate it is."
• So it seem unlikely the article will ever see any references. I don't live in India, but as far as I can tell this TV channel lacks notability.

/ Mats Halldin (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, I can't find any sources either, and a real Indian TV channel would have them. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - You're more patient than I am. Torc2 (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. "Those doubting the reliability of the content of this article should search the web and see for themselves how accurate it is" sounds like "Oh, I'm too lazy to actually put references on this article, so other people should do it for me." Burden of proof is on the person creating the article. TheLetterM (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep w/ addition of references. The article will need more, but at the very least, it's sourced (if minimally so). TheLetterM (talk) 21:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete without prejudice. If sources can be provided at a later date, we can re-create the article then. RFerreira (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.