Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binaria
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 21:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Binaria[edit]
Delete for same reasons as King Andy above. Lots of hits on google but none seem related to the topic. Unverifiable. JJay 01:26, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --JJay 01:26, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Ncsaint 01:34, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Linuxbeak | Alex Schenck 01:46, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoaxes. — Haeleth Talk 17:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Rogerd 17:14, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax. --MPerel ( talk | contrib) 11:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep!!! For same reasons as king andy... is legit... you think otherwise then just get a clue in life already!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.196.223.90 (talk • contribs)
- Delete The only references to Binaria and King Andy I can find appear to be in the two Wikipedia entries. If this is real, we need much better information, otherwise kill it. --StoatBringer 15:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hoax. *drew 02:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.