Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimala Rai

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 13:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bimala Rai[edit]

Bimala Rai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to pass general notability guideline and no evidence to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - existing sources aren't reliable. No reliable, independent and significant sources can be located on Google. - TheMagnificentist 12:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 15:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 11:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.