Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilmuri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bilmuri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG; WP:MUSICBIO - "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries" There is no coverage of this standard referenced here. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Why is the page listed for deletion over "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries" There is no coverage of this standard referenced here. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)" but the article has 7 cited articles and reviews from 4 different independent press outlets? How does this not cover the standards referenced above? Do you not accept them in online versions or do you not accept independent press at all? Im confused. Thank you for your time!" - DBScott1995 (talk) 01:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 05:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Concerning the questions in the previous comment, see WP:SIGCOV which says that media coverage has to be in reliable sources AND it has to be significant or non-trivial. Bilmuri has indeed gotten some reviews, as already cited in the article, but they are all minor announcements that do not go into any critical depth, and every single one that I can find shows that Bilmuri was only noticed because the guy was previously in Attack Attack! (American band). Therefore WP:NOTINHERITED kicks in as well. This article is also dependent on claims that an undefined body of fans liked stuff on social media. A Bilmuri article might be viable in the future, but not yet. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Puff piece. Oaktree b (talk) 14:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.