Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy 'Pop' Attmore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 01:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Billy 'Pop' Attmore[edit]

Does every Mousketeer need their own article? I'm not in the US, so don't know just how much of a cultural impact this show had — maybe this should be cleaned up and expanded instead. His IMDB entry shows him as having appeared in occasional episodes of other programmes, but (it appears) all in fairly minor roles. If kept, this one will have to be slash-and-burn rewritten from the ground up (in this case, aside from adding in the other roles, I don't propose to do this myself as I've no knowledge of the subject). — iridescent 15:34, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think being a Mouseketeer is automatically notable. He's certainly not the only one of his peers not to have an article -- even in the original cast numerous actors don't have articles, nor those of the most recent incarnation which spawned a couple of superstars. In fact, I have my doubts about some of the names that do have bluelinks. --Dhartung | Talk 16:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Well, I suppose it's good to see Mouseketeer fancruft instead of the more usual Pokemon and Star Wars, but he's still not notable. KleenupKrew (talk) 12:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 01:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.