Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Wringe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to An Expressive Theory of Punishment. Weighing the policy based arguments I'm seeing more strength in the arguments for redirection to An Expressive Theory of Punishment rather than the delete comments. As such, I'm seeing a consensus for redirection rather than deletion. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Wringe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. StudiesWorld (talk) 12:42, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:06, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The references include two reviews of a book he wrote. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with above. Not notable enough at this stage. MaskedSinger (talk) 14:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to An Expressive Theory of Punishment. The book is more clearly wiki-notable than he is; without some indication that he has also been recognized for a second thing, we don't really have a case for an article about him. One multiply-reviewed book is a good start towards WP:PROF/WP:AUTHOR, but it's not enough by itself. XOR'easter (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. The book is borderline-notable but we don't have enough material for separate articles about both the book and its author, and the author is currently notable only for the book (WP:BIO1E). —David Eppstein (talk) 21:14, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per the two preceding comments. --Tataral (talk) 22:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.