Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Webster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus to delete. A merge may be pursued editorially. Eluchil404 (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Bill Webster

Bill Webster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character is an "In-universe" article (see WP:WAF) about a non-notable fictional character on the show Coronation Street. Although this character has had many years to become notable, the character has been recurring throuout years but has no real world content while having appeared since 1984. The article neither cites any references or sources.

• Merge with List of recurring and minor Coronation Street characters, i could not find any reliable sources only 1 external link at ITV.com, non-notable whatsoever. User:Notdoppler 25 August 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Such a long-running character is notable, and there will be sources out there, just not recent ones that pop up on the first page of a google search! For instance, wasn't this character one of the controversial axings by producer Brian Parks in the 1990s? Definitely has the potential to be more than plot summary, anyway.GunGagdin^Moan 11:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per the above. Just because we can't find Internet sources doesn't mean they aren't notable.--UpDown (talk) 11:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as as a user said above he was involved in the controversial axings that made headlines in the UK. I think that a long running character is also notable. Just need expanding upon. Raintheone (talk) 11:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.