Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill G. Chapman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bill G. Chapman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The sources used are 1) The subject's book 2) his Obituary in the local newspaper and 3) the home page to Central Baptist Theological Seminary, which has no mention of the subject. A Search turned up no sources that would support a claim of notability. GPL93 (talk) 03:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. Per my search he doesn't pass GNG. I suspect Coping With Vision Loss: Maximizing What You Can See and Do might pass NBOOK (e.g. held by 162 libraries - plausible there are independent reviews - though Hunter House Publishers raises perhaps some questions) - but I haven't found independent reviews (hard to filter with all the crud that is out there on commercial books). I don't think Chapman meets NAUTHOR for authoring one possibly notable book. Might be scope for a re-purpose to the book if notability of the book is established. Icewhiz (talk) 07:24, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:09, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I ran some news archive searches, on variants of his name, different keywords, and title of book, but I'm not finding him. Feel free to ping me to reconsider if anyone has more success.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.