Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Funt
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Bill Funt[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bill Funt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I initially PRODed this with the following rationale: "Non-notable individual who does not pass the WP:GNG. The only claim to notability in the article is his relation to his more notable father and brother, but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Searching for sources turns up nothing but minor mentions, and no significant coverage." However, it turned out that the article had already been deleted via PROD way back in 2009, and then recreated, making it ineligible for deletion via PROD again, so I am bringing it here. Rorshacma (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. Rorshacma (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, nominator has proven that notability is not asserted here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Notability has not been shown. The article clearly fails WP:GNG. This is a case, as noted by the nominator, that WP:NOTINHERITED. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 20:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.