Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bihartimes.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 00:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bihartimes.com[edit]
- Bihartimes.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Awfully promotional article about a news website. Written by user:Bihartimes. Is it notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, see below.
Delete. I don't see how; there's one reference to the article, but that's it. Google News gives nothing at all.Drmies (talk) 02:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply. Google News does give something. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Here's another source to go with the one already in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoa, I stand corrected--I don't know why my Google News search produced nothing but strange false positives (for instance, a NYT article with no "Bihartimes.com" in it). I'm changing my vote; some of the hits generated by Phil Bridger's search discuss the site in-depth enough, and there are plenty of mentions that suggest the site is notable. (The article is still overwhelmingly promotional and needs cutting.) Thanks Phil. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.