Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Shine Energy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Big Shine Energy[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Big Shine Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:CORP. Google search for the name comes up with 53 unique results, none of which discuss the company in significant detail. ... discospinster talk 22:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Minimal coverage in reliable sources, nowhere near enough to meet corporate notability. PohranicniStraze (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 08:03, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete or merge to Big Shine Worldwide (if the latter is kept!). Not quite enough coverage to meet WP:CORP. Pichpich (talk) 02:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. \\\Septrillion:- ~~~~10Eleventeen 20:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete fails GNG. Dial911 (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.