Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BigBreaks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BigBreaks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally PROD'd with the rationale "Non-notable advert; everything WP is not, and undisclosed paid editing against the terms-of-use.[1]". The PROD was contested; the article is still an advert about a non-notable company. ——SerialNumber54129 09:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). The few sources out there are clearly just based on company press releases. There is nothing that could be called independent and in-depth.Glendoremus (talk) 00:36, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is too promotional in tone and style, and lacks any sources that establish notability.TH1980 (talk) 04:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Need Indian-language sources—This is a domestic Indian private firm. The ability to find documentation on US and European firms which are private is difficult, and this being an Indian domestic company multiplies that difficulty. I've done a bit of chopping and revision to the article, adding two citations (one of these certain does not contribute to notabiity). --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not seeing the reliable source coverage for it to meet WP:BASIC Oddparents (talk) 10:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 21:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.