Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biff and Charlie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biff and Charlie[edit]

not notable; fails WP:FICTION. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn per the article itself and a gsearch (192 gits for "Biff and Charlie" and none in news; 3 passing hits from Books and Scholar). JJL (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. JBsupreme (talk) 03:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Author of work appears notable (Emmy nomination), proper development of article impeded because article began being slammed with deletion tags after its creator, a new editor, had written one paragraph. Give its author a chance under WP:BITE. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the author does indeed seem notable; perhaps creating a page for him and making this page a redirect to that would be best. JJL (talk) 14:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable...not even close. -- 68.183.104.7 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per above.. -- 128.97.245.3 (talk) 12:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment created Chambers Stevens and suggest a redirect. JJL (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable and I am dubious about the notability of the play's author. Sgroupace (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not to badger you, but why do you think an Emmy nominee would not be notable? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: clearly not notable. -- 149.142.220.74 (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.