Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biel TVZ (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biel TVZ[edit]

Biel TVZ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability, fonts are paid promotions. He even made a video himself teaching how to write an article about yourself on Wikipedia. Horcoff (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: self-promotion WP:SOAPBOX. In the pt.WP, this article was deleted four times for this same reason. Fails WP:N and any other notability criteria, reinforce that this entry is not qualified to remain as an entry, I agree to permanently delete this entry and block future creations. Moniiquedecastro! Dimmi!!! 17:14, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moniiquedecastro, what is your connection to Kacamata? You offer almost the exact same deletion argument and you have an identical signature. Do we need to open an SPI case here? Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They likely copied my signature. Which is odd, is that the account opened the first AfD on this article, but they did it without a proper rationale. They also are normally in the other side of a AfD voting to "keep", since they normally create a lot of article with questionable notability. I would really like to understand their behavior and intentions here. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 13:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moniiquedecastro, I just agree with the position, I make it clear that my contribution is in good faith. I have no connection with Kacamata. Moniiquedecastro!!! 4:15, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Moniiquedecastro, I'm new here so I don't have all the knowledge, but every day I learn more. I'm not fluent in your language, but I'm specifying myself in English. I can prove that this person paid to be here with an entry, this artist produced a video teaching how to have a page on Wikipedia, that is self-promotion, and as I know, creating an entry is not right, but now I leave it to you to decide. https://web.archive.org/web/20221020061035/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tVa196YoKg&feature=youtu.be I make it clear that I will abstain, because I see that my presence is not adding up, I am sad to have as much dedication Wikipedian here and to be frowned upon. — Preceding undated comment added 04:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.