Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicycle Hills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bicycle Hills[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. PROD was removed under the argument that merging with the author would be preferable, but as neither are notable they should both be deleted (I already nominated the latter for AFD) Dronebogus (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:NBOOK, orWP:GNG, zero useable reviews found in a gsearch. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I suggested the merge or redirect but that possibility has been deleted. ~Kvng (talk) 13:59, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, I don't see, as is, this meets notability. --Surv1v4l1st ^{▌Talk|Contribs▌} 23:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.