Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BiBi Jones
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BiBi Jones[edit]
- BiBi Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence that the subject actually can satisfy WP:PORNBIO or WP:ANYBIO. She started her career a few months ago, and appeared in only 9 movies... Cavarrone (talk) 13:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my original prod. Fails the GNG and all relevant SNGs. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. Paste Let’s have a chat. 17:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree with mentioned rationales. Too soon. Coverage by RS is so trivial. History of article already shows a BLP nightmare. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per notability. There aren't any major and reliable sources, obviously given that she's a porn star. SwisterTwister talk 22:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kepp: She is notable. She appeared in XBIZ and AVN News's reports for serveral times. Please read these websites BiBi Jones Lands Hot Video Magazine Cover,Digital Playground Ships ‘Babysitters 2’,Digital Playground, RogReviews Team Up for Caption Contest and Digital Playground Brings Back 'Babysitters' . Both XBIZ and AVN News are mainstream media in porn industry. Therefore, this article SATISFIES the WP:PORNBIO: Has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.--Coekon (talk) 01:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - no, mainstream as in non-pornographic media like tv shows, radio, movies, and music videos. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP - SHE IS VERY BEAUTIFUL AND YOUR PORNOS EXCITING ME. 189.35.84.241 (talk) 16:06, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.