Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhutan national under-17 football team results
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Bhutan national under-17 football team results[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bhutan national under-17 football team results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Results pages exist for senior national teams, but as a rule, not for junior teams. Extending the results service from senior to junior level fails WP:NOTSTATS. Junior teams do not receive the same amount of coverage and their players are not presumed notable. Precedents for deletion include the similar discussions for India, Indonesia and Uzbekistan - in addition, there has been an effort to clean up Asian youth football stats-cruft in the form of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1988 AFC Youth Championship qualification and several related qualifications. Geschichte (talk) 12:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:42, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Junior sport is rarely notable. The fact that the article hasn't been updated since it was created in 2015 perhaps shows that there's little interest in this anyway. Nigej (talk) 13:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - simply not needed, NOTSTATS. GiantSnowman 08:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of significant coverage. The basic level of coverage provided by RSSSF and AFC is insufficient. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no RS - NOTSTATS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.