Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhobhar - The Live Ash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm sorry Gshrotriya but there's a clear consensus that this doesn't meet WP:NFILMS at this time. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bhobhar - The Live Ash[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Notability not established according to WP:NFILMS or WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cind.amuse 12:17, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coment While I gave the article a bit of a cleanup to prep it for expansion, and while the director himself might have just enough Wikipedia notability[1] to have an article, I am having difficulty myself in expanding and sourcing this film article. A number of possibilities come up with a gogle search,[2] but I cannot find any archived news coverage. I will grant that this is likely due to the film being an Indian film in Hindi and Rajasthani, so if others better able to improve the article can do so, I would be happy to offer a "keep" Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from the director of the film I would like everybody to check the film's page "Bhobhar the film" on facebook which contains links to several press articles during its screening in Jaipur International Film Festival 2011. There are several stills from the film and production stills also available. Besides, the film is relatively new and not yet released in theatres, lot of stuff in press is not available. Film at presnt is doing festival rounds after which it would have the thatrical release. Gajendra Shrotriya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gshrotriya (talk • contribs) 08:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Working on account of WP:NFILMS, and based on the director's comments above, I am also working off of WP:CRYSTAL. I can make no assumption at this time that it will be released to theaters. Unless there is clear-cut evidence that this WILL be released in theaters, I'm sticking to this. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the director says "lot of stuff in press is not available." If the movie gets serious press then the article can be recreated. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.