Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhikkhu Cintita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhikkhu Cintita[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable religious figure. Does not appear to have received significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Fails WP:BIO. VocalIndia (talk) 03:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:53, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He meets WP:NAUTHOR or not, I'm not sure. I only found this coverage from the major newspaper Austin American-Statesman. VocalIndia (talk) 14:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Does not appear to be notable. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the source above is not a relaible source. It is basically the personal reflection of a person who happens to have at one point been a member of the congregation that Cintita was the leader of, and it has other issues of local coverage that come up. That is not the type of article that we can use as a source to justify inclusion in Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.