Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhavesh Kumar (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Deleting this one - looks like it might be WP:TOOSOON. WP:REFUND applies. Thanks everyone for contributing and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavesh Kumar[edit]

Bhavesh Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The previous AfD for this article was closed with unanimous consensus to delete, and I'm not seeing any improvement in notability. With only one role in an unreleased movie announced since the previous AfD, Kumar still fails WP:NACTOR and WP:TOOSOON still applies. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete and salt despite the interesting claims of being tallest actor in hollywood, He is a real sportsman Junior Discus thrower, and extraordinarily helpful for fellow sports persons, and my favourite: in 2019, being conferred with "Times Education Icons Award" for providing education to poor children since 1922. The subject was born in Nov 2000. Anyways. The subject fails WP:NACTOR, and WP:GNG as well. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: Doesn't give much of the depth in coverage. But I guess passes WP:THREE. Lunar Clock (talk) 12:30, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi. WP:THREE is an opinion of an individual editor. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now. 1 movie 1 yet to be released does not make him notable. Maybe in a few years' time when he has made an impact. PenulisHantu (talk)
  • Weak Keep: He has starred in one film and has another two films coming out soon in which he will also be starring, it seems. The article may be WP:TOOSOON, but I'm hesitant to vote to "delete", especially since he's already got quite a few references (more than mere in-passing references). Dflaw4 (talk) 10:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.