Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharat Goenka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted under the G12 criterion for Unambiguous copyright violation MLauba (talk) 00:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC) Note that nothing precludes the recreation of a non-infringing article based on the sources uncovered here, as long as content is no longer copy / pasted from third party sources. MLauba (talk) 00:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bharat Goenka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This bio page is a content fork of Tally Solutions. Being a board member of a company does not of itself meet the requirements of WP:BIO. Ash (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Tally Solutions. Our article is partially copypasted from this website. However, I've found several independent and reliable sources (oneindia, Computer Reseller News, indiatimes.com, businessgyan.com) proving notability of this person. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 15:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added the references suggested by Vejvančický. In my view, the article now demonstrates notability. Bharat Goenka's title is managing director. In British and Indian business, the title is normally equivalent to chief executive officer. (In the financial services sector in the United States and Canada, the title usually refers to an executive of lower rank.) -- Eastmain (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Checking the sources added I'm unclear as to how this addresses notability as defined by WP:BIO. As per the nomination, being a CEO or MD does not of itself imply notability.—Ash (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This person and their works have been the subject of a lot of non-trivial coverage from independent and reliable sources. Seems to meet WP:N to me. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.