Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhangu Aman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhangu Aman[edit]

Bhangu Aman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:GNG. I am unable to find significant discussion of this singer in reliable sources. The Hindustan Times Times of India article does not appear to be real. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 17:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page as it is the record label started by the above individual and also contains a newspaper link (Hindustan Times) that is likely fake:

Trendy Beat Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) ... discospinster talk 19:26, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I tried search on Google and Bing both and clearly founded that first link is official facebook profile then youtube channel, afterwards we may see all the links are from online digital stores like iTunes, Amazon, Spotify. So it clearly shows that this is valid artist. An article is also avaliable at Times of India and local newspapers published many articles on Bhangu Aman. --Bhangu Aman 18:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhanguaman2 (talkcontribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Couldn't find significant coverage in independent sources. The supposed Times of India article used as a reference, looks very suspect and is a likely forgery. Abecedare (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.