Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the Dead Future

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A9. Randykitty (talk) 09:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond the Dead Future[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A seemingly unnotable album that fails WP:NALBUM. It was PRODed shortly after its creation back in 2006, but the PROD was contested due to the fact that the album was discussed on the artist's page, though that page has, since then, been deleted. The references currently on the page are not valid as reliable sources, and after some searches, I have been unable to find any substantial coverage or reviews on the album. Rorshacma (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: as the artist no longer has a Wikipedia page, I would think this qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:A9 – the two "references" included in the article are simply links to web retailers where the album can be obtained, so no indication of importance either. Richard3120 (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. Aoba47 (talk) 21:45, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: A9 Ceethekreator (talk) 00:05, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This fails notability test entirely. 17:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Silika. O. Silika ^{talk}
Speedy delete (tagging with A9). Doesn't seem to be any coverage, significant or otherwise, and nothing seems to suggest this is important or significant. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.